One problem that exists on both sides of the political/gender spectrum, is the nasty habit of speaking for other people, which is something that both politiicans and political parties do far too often.
Trump, likes to speak for everybody all the time, "Nobody has ever saw anything like this before." I mean who is Nobody? is that a references to Everybody? Is he speaking for the whole world all 8 billion people? He does this all the time.
Also college professors did that whole "Latinx" thing for a while, which was their version of speaking on behalf of all Spanish spekers in all of the Latin American countries attempting to change their languange, while also forgetting that those languanges that originated in Latin and Rome, have masculne and feminine structers built into the foundations of their language, so trying to "gender nuetral" their language is a fools errand. But then again sometimes college professors can be quite foolish. This problem has been easily solved by simply listening to Latinos who have always hated that phrase, and taking a few Spanish, French, Italian, Portuguese, or Romaninian lessons (Latin Languages).
Democrats also like to speak on behalf of "the medical community" when they want to pass transgender laws, they convinenently forget that the newest science suggests their policies are wrong and should be abandoned and cause harm. They also tend to fail to mention how some professional groups like the American College of Pediatriacs have ocme out and called for all this transgender stuff to stop and for people to return to already known and accepted and settled science and sanity.
CLICK BELOW TO READ THEIR STATEMENT
https://acpeds.org/topics/sexuality-issues-of-youth/gender-confusion-and-transgender-identity/deconstructing-transgender-pediatrics
But also....
Trump is very feminine in his rhetorical English, and what I mean by that is that I was watching Jake Tapper interview J.D. Vance earlier today, and later on I watched about 30 minutes of Trump's wannabe Hitler speech at MSG. And I realized these two people talk like my ex girlfirends, their responses are just off.
Every guy has sort of been in a situation like poor Jake Tapper was in with J.D Vance. Jake Tapper asked a simple question about a current issue that recently happened, a problem. And the response back was some miandering argument that had absolutelty nothing to do with what was asked, and included some old pointless information about something that happened years ago that really isn't relevant. (Every man who has been in a relationship with a woman has been caught in this situation once or twice) So Jake Tapper, did what most guys do, which is ignore the response, and try to bring it back to the question, which fails 99.9% of the time with women, because they just start picking apart what you just said, and then after about 3-5 minutes the conversation gets "testy" and then eventualy the guy just usually gives up and walks away before he says something he would regret and would get him in seriouse trouble.
For J.D. Vance and most women, this is a win.
But it is also horrendous communication, and something people should probably work on. Part of good communication is staying on topic, addressing one problem at a time, and not conflating random bits of information that confuse both people to the point of exhaustion, that's more avoiding problems and not solving them, and making communication worse by develping a horrendous habit, then it is being a good communicator.
And then later on in the day, I was watching Trump doing his Hitler routine in New York City, and he would just do the same thing. He would sort of be on a topic of some kind, then meander into something else, ridicule someone else, speak on behalf of other people, then sorta get back on topic for two seconds, before going off into some other bizzare tangent. By the end I guess you would call it some kind of speech or conversation but really it was just someone who just says whatever they are feeling in the exact moment without any plan or structure and just word salads out whatever he is feeling at the time. Any way Trump kind of like a woman, in the sense that you can ask a woman how her day went, expecting a couple minutes of her telling you how her day went, but get some random hour long emotional response where she recounts everything she did during the day and how she was feeling and what should be done in the future and something about the past, and by the end when she asks "How was your day" its like an hour or two later and you had completley forgot what you did and respond with "good"
